“Making the decision to regulate CO2…is likely to have serious economic consequences for regulated entities throughout the U.S. economy, including small businesses and small communities...” A spokesman for OMB said...the brief is a “conglomeration of counsel we’ve received from various agencies” about the EPA finding, the conclusions of which would trigger regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act...
“In the absence of a strong statement of the standards being applied in this decision, there is concern that EPA is making a finding based on…’harm’ from substances that have no demonstrated direct health effects,” the memo says, adding that the “scientific data that purports to conclusively establish” that link was from outside EPA.
But here is the real kicker. There’s language in the memo that says there may be beneficial effects to increased CO2 rather than negative effects, and that man, as always, can quickly adapt:
“To the extent that climate change alters our environment, it will create incentives for innovation and adaption that mitigate the damages,” the memo reads. “The [EPA finding] should note this possibility[.] … It might be reasonable to conclude that Alaska will benefit from warmer winters for both health and economic reasons,” the authors note...
3 comments:
I saw your comment re every blogger linking and the collective voice being heard. Right on! It's slow going but you got my attention. Keep up the fight
Good on yer mate...
It's the same out here too, they desperately want to foist this shit upon us too. Just recently though, they've sorted of come to their senses, more people are waking up and the economic crisis will mean that people will lose even more jobs and they'll start wondering what all this is for.
Hussein's window is closing, fast. If he has any brains, he'll junk it before he looks like the fool he is.
Post a Comment