...and from the UK Economist, courtesy PKH, a retired professor of physics writes...
...Indur Goklany questioned whether global warming has caused an increase in droughts and floods... Letters, October 10th. In fact, the answer is already well settled. That question was examined thoroughly by the Intergovernmental Panel on ClimateChange. In its 2001 report, one chapter, titled "Has climate variability, or have climate extremes, changed?", concluded that there was no discernible increase in storms, hurricanes, floods or droughts. A re-examination of that issue therefore seemed unnecessary in the IPCC's 2007 report. Concerning rising sea levels, this is a more complex issue since a natural increase of 1-2mm a year has been occurring for many centuries. However,over the past few decades no anthropogenic signal in sea-level changes has been detected. This is firmly backed up by precise satellite altimetry. Meanwhile it was just last month that Professor Mojib Latif of the University of Kiel in Germany, a renowned climate expert and IPCC author, presented his latest work at the World Climate Conference in Geneva. His findings show that the mean global temperature has actually declined since 2001. Moreover, his computer models predict a further temperature drop over the coming decades. All of this beckons the question: just where are the supposedly detrimental effects of anthropogenic CO2?
2 comments:
The proof of the warmists real ideology lies in the high likelihood that no matter how much you sacrifice; and i'm talking go vegan, live in a cave, crap in a hole and all that; the greenies will never tell you that it's finally enough, that the climate is fine now, that you can go back to the flushing toilet and putting that light on.
But, but, but we'd all be happier living in caves, crapping in holes and eating the odd rodent that came by. It stands to reason. Ask Osama bin Laden.
And anyway, I want to ride on public transport pulled by fit, strong sweaty youg girls, all singing Kumbaya...
Post a Comment