... after we consider our involvement in an ill fated relationship or business venture, we may ask ourselves "how could it happen ?" I imagine that many scientists surveying the wreckage of "climate science" are asking this question and reviewing their involvement and the extent of the stain on their careers. This article by Jerome Ravetz of Oxford University "...environmental consultant and professor of philosophy of science best known for his books challenging the assumptions of scientific objectivity..." looks at the process of entanglement from a science perspective, and includes these observations...
Showing posts with label Dissident scientists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dissident scientists. Show all posts
Thursday, 11 February 2010
The treason of the scientists...
... after we consider our involvement in an ill fated relationship or business venture, we may ask ourselves "how could it happen ?" I imagine that many scientists surveying the wreckage of "climate science" are asking this question and reviewing their involvement and the extent of the stain on their careers. This article by Jerome Ravetz of Oxford University "...environmental consultant and professor of philosophy of science best known for his books challenging the assumptions of scientific objectivity..." looks at the process of entanglement from a science perspective, and includes these observations...... As all these anomalies and unsolved puzzles emerged, the neat, compelling picture became troubled and even confused... But the political cause had been taken up by powerful advocates, like Al Gore...
...and was typified by former Colorado senator Tim Wirth when he remarked in the early days of the climate campaign that “we’ve got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” Not surprisingly, after Wirth left the Senate and the Clinton administration he ended up at the United Nations...however...
...We found ourselves in another crusading ‘War’, like those on 'Drugs' and 'Terror'. This new War, on Carbon, was equally simplistic, and equally prone to corruption and failure. Global warming science became the core element of this major worldwide campaign to save the planet. Any weakening of the scientific case would have amounted to a betrayal of the good cause, as well as a disruption of the growing research effort. All critics, even those who were full members of the scientific peer community, had to be derided and dismissed. As we learned from the CRU e-mails, they were not considered to be entitled to the normal courtesies of scientific sharing and debate. Requests for information were stalled, and as one witty blogger has put it, ‘peer review’ was replaced by ‘pal review’. Even now, the catalogue of unscientific practices revealed in the mainstream media is very small in comparison to what is available on the blogosphere. Details of shoddy science and dirty tricks abound. By the end, the committed inner core were confessing to each other that global temperatures were falling, but it was far too late to change course...In needing to treat Planet Earth like a textbook exercise, the climate scientists were forced to break the rules of scientific etiquette and ethics, and to play scientific power-politics in a way that inevitably became corrupt...
...Ravetz then introduces, with a degree of undeserved compassion, the grassroots 'extended peers' and cheerleaders for alarmism and corrupt science; the loathsome greens...
...To have a political effect, the ‘extended peers’ of science have traditionally needed to operate largely by means of activist pressure-groups using the media to create public alarm. In this case, since the global warmers had captured the moral high ground, criticism has remained scattered and ineffective, except on the blogosphere. The position of Green activists is especially difficult, even tragic (!) ; they have been ‘extended peers’ who were co-opted into the ruling paradigm, which in retrospect can be seen as a decoy or diversion from the real, complex issues of sustainability, as shown by Mike Hulme. Now they must do some very serious re-thinking about their position and their role...
...and what of the future for climate science ? What has been learned ?
...Scientists who have been forced to work on the blogosphere have had the invaluable experience of exclusion and oppression; that could make it easier for them to accept that something is seriously wrong and then to engage in the challenging moral adventures of dealing with uncertainty and ignorance. The new technologies of communications are revolutionising knowledge and power in many areas. The extended peer community of science on the blogosphere will be playing its part in that process. Let dialogue commence!...more here...
...H/T and thanks to WuWT...
...and with a bow towards my northern hemisphere roots, and striking a blow for multi-culturalism, all you ever needed to know about Cockney rhyming slang, including the Cockney alphabet, here...
...and in closing for the day, an INVITATION...would you like to monitor the temperature (and morale) of the warmists ? See this exchange...here... although right now (5.26pm.) their site is down. Hope it's not hari-kari all round...
Labels:
Climatastrophe,
Dissident scientists,
Jerome ravetz
Tuesday, 16 December 2008
Scientists abandon global warming 'lie'....
...and when the dust settles, the biggest mistake made in the battle for hearts and minds will be seen to be Al Gore's desperate and arrogant statement that "the debate is over, the science is settled..." Recent events have shown too, that ex-leaders George Bush and John Howard were correct to oppose the lunacy of Kyoto, more here...and see Christopher Monckton's open letter to John Key here...(thanks to NonPC).
Note too, that within the scientific community there are still plenty of men and women of integrity who have taken umbrage at the scientific abuses perpetrated in their name. Here are some of them, and they will not be silenced...
- "I am a skeptic ... . Global warming has become a new religion." -- Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
- "Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined." -- Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh, Pa.
- "Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly ... . As a scientist I remain skeptical." -- Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a Ph.D. in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called "among the most pre-eminent scientists of the last 100 years."
- Warming fears are the "worst scientific scandal in the history ... . When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists." -- U.N. IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning Ph.D. environmental physical chemist.
- "The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn't listen to others. It doesn't have open minds ... . I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists." -- Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the U.N.-supported International Year of the Planet.
- "The models and forecasts of the U.N. IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity." -- Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico.
- "It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming." -- U.S. Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
- "Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapor and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will." -- Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, New Zealand.
- "After reading [U.N. IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet." -- Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an associate editor of Monthly Weather Review....More comments here...
- and for the full article, click here...H/T Eric, who dragged himself away from The Pool Bar...
Labels:
Dissident scientists
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
