The history of the great global warming scam...

...The story begins with an Oceanographer named Roger Revelle. He served with the Navy in World War II. After the war he became the Director of the Scripps Oceanographic Institute in La Jolla in San Diego, California. Revelle saw the opportunity to obtain major funding from the Navy for doing measurements and research on the ocean around the Pacific Atolls where the US military was conducting atomic bomb tests. He greatly expanded the Institute's areas of interest and among others hired Hans Suess, a noted Chemist from the University of Chicago, who was very interested in the traces of carbon in the environment from the burning of fossil fuels. Revelle tagged on to Suess studies and co-authored a paper with him in 1957. The paper raises the possibility that the carbon dioxide might be creating a greenhouse effect and causing atmospheric warming...

...Back in the 1960s, this global warming research came to the attention of a Canadian born United Nation's bureaucrat named Maurice Strong. He was looking for issues he could use to fulfill his dream of one-world government. Strong organized a World Earth Day event in Stockholm, Sweden in 1970. From this he developed a committee of scientists, environmentalists and political operatives from the UN to continue a series of meetings...

more, here...

and this, in a nutshell is what it's all about...

....Now that pretty much all (OK, all) evidence now directly refutes the global warming premise–ice core data, lack of relationship between CO2 and temperatures, missing greenhouse gas signature, falling temperatures last ten years while CO2 is soaring, etc.–the entire theory is like a house almost completely consumed by termites, and ready to collapse into dust with the next strong wind. What will that do to the scientific and journalistic community? It will set back their credibility for years, maybe decades. By suggesting that the “scientific debate” is now a side show, and the real debate is on a political level, Dr. Pielke I believe is trying to cushion the backlash against the scientific community that is becoming inevitable. That’s an honorable goal and I hope it succeeds. The scientific community is going to have to go through an era of soul-searching to make sure such a vast amount of mis-information is not served up to society ever again...

...more here...